Salesforce Practice
Salesforce Testing Services
Erpvora Technologies tests Salesforce changes so releases go live without unpleasant surprises. We provide functional, regression and user acceptance testing across Salesforce platforms, giving you confidence that new work behaves correctly and existing processes still hold.
Functional, regression and user acceptance testing that protects Salesforce quality through change and releases.
The business challenge
Salesforce orgs change constantly: new automation, configuration, custom code and seasonal platform releases. Each change can quietly break something elsewhere, and in complex orgs the interactions are hard to predict. When testing is rushed or skipped, defects reach users, and the cost of fixing them in production is far higher than catching them earlier.
Manual, undocumented testing does not scale. The same checks are repeated inconsistently, regressions slip through, and nobody is sure exactly what was verified. As the org grows, the risk of each release rises unless testing becomes structured and repeatable.
Our approach
We build test coverage around the processes that matter most to the business, so critical paths are verified every time something changes. We combine functional testing of new work with regression testing of existing processes, and we document what was tested so quality is evidenced, not assumed.
We run user acceptance testing with the people who do the work, so defects and usability issues surface before go-live. Where it adds value, we help introduce automated and repeatable testing, so regression coverage scales with the org instead of depending on memory.
Capabilities
- Functional testing of new configuration and development
- Regression testing of existing critical processes
- User acceptance testing with business users
- Test planning, cases and documented coverage
- Release and seasonal update testing
- Guidance on automated and repeatable testing
How we deliver
- 01
Plan
We identify the critical processes and changes to cover and write test cases that reflect real business scenarios.
- 02
Prepare
We set up test data and environments so testing reflects how the org is actually used.
- 03
Execute
We run functional and regression tests, documenting results so coverage is evidenced rather than assumed.
- 04
Validate
We run user acceptance testing with business users to surface defects and usability issues before go-live.
- 05
Report
We report defects clearly, confirm fixes and give a documented view of quality ahead of release.
Typical use cases
- Validating a major release before it reaches users
- Regression testing critical processes after changes
- Running user acceptance testing for a new rollout
- Checking readiness for a seasonal platform update
- Confirming integrations still work after changes
- Introducing repeatable testing for a growing org
Business impact
- Releases that go live without unpleasant surprises
- Critical processes verified every time the org changes
- Defects caught before they reach production
- Documented evidence of what was tested
- User acceptance that surfaces real-world issues
- Regression coverage that scales with the org
Frequently asked questions
Why not just test manually before each release?
Manual, undocumented testing is inconsistent and does not scale. We make testing structured and repeatable so regressions are caught reliably as the org grows.
Do you cover existing processes or only new changes?
Both. We test new work functionally and run regression tests on existing critical processes, since a change in one area can affect another.
Who takes part in user acceptance testing?
The people who actually do the work. Involving business users surfaces defects and usability issues that only appear in real scenarios before go-live.
Can you help us automate testing?
Yes. Where it adds value, we help introduce automated and repeatable testing so regression coverage scales rather than relying on memory.